Per non abusare dell’ospitalità solo la parte iniziale di questa lettera aperta è stata postata, quale commento personale, sul blog di Savino al post IL FATTORE B .
Lettera aperta a Savino Pezzotta.
Carissimo Savino ,
è un bit 'that do not follow you.
Our newest and synthetic raw private exchange is not the cause but the consequence of two opposing cultural worlds to see and do.
However, this does not change, at least for me, the "value" of a person, even with all the possible limits that this might have.
There is freedom of thought and action in a democracy.
A dear friend pointed me to two of your recent speeches  , begging me to give it a try. What I've done not only for the items, but also for the comments.
This my open letter , not surprisingly, I wanted to post it here, because what you call " B" is none other than the Church, especially consecrated "in perpetuity" even if now the lay state, and ... that in the past gave much the same.
In turn I see many " zuccabanchi " and you know what they mean in our country: those who (Faris) follows the law, the rants, the notes but not sterile ... apply. And usually if they glory ... well ... just like, not the real one that works in silence and silent, but similar to that of Phaedrus frog who wants to become an ox.
know how many "saints" proclaimed (by themselves) I see around?
yet are considering that my friend journalist, who knew from personal experience that it is now physically a very holy and goes out of fashion. One day I said, "What is saint for the church can be, but it was a peasant to me is well established. .
So with the help of Clio, a quick search may highlight the social status of the various players and see how these Christians have to actually work or what ... ... just for you. Some indexes are Redditometro of religious and social real or assumed.
income, as you know, is not only an economic factor, but, often, the index of "availability" of being Christian " Samaritan," or of being alone " priest " or " Levite" in the family, work, enterprise, in politics, ... the Church and in society itself.
And who is not culturally profane history makes it clear what it was in reality the political and social Samaria (Shomron) and the Samaritans themselves.
is why there is a camel through the eye of the needle, the opulence and destitution of those who have trumpeted the many who "want to" wearing only society.
A useful question would be: what we are materially rich we who profess to be Christians?
Le encicliche servono? Dipende da cosa dicono e, queste, – è bene sottolinearlo – non sono verità assoluta; anzi, talora, possono essere dei miopi saggi di filosofia o di sociologia fine a sé stessi. Difatti un tuo commentatore ha sottolineato saggiamente la sostanziale essenza di due papi del secolo scorso rispetto ai successori.
Un breve “ conto spese ”, declamatomi in quel di Rosano , è il metro giusto per comprendere quanto la carità e la virtù ipotetica possano essere vere o indicative di una certa superficialità cristiana pure lassù in … alto.
Not everyone, of course, are in the "sleeves" of the Vatican curia, and here is precisely the difference between being a man in its entirety ... or sheep that meekly follows the ram.
The song of last Sunday's Sunday gospel is quite indicative in this respect, because it essentially raises the dilemma. Perhaps the same dilemma that often occurs and that disturbs your conscience as a man disheartened, and hours of political union in the past.
A dilemma of the disciples of Emmaus.
A dilemma of imperfect people who did not in itself a progetto completo e compiuto, ma solo input sapienziali e escatologici a cui non sa dare attinente risposta: Noi pensavamo che …!
Tempo fa in un commento sul post di un comune amico ho già elucubrato sul caso - tanto da te sottolineato - sulla pedofilia ecclesiastica.
E, riassumendo con due parole, è molto strano che questo problema sia stato affrontato solo ora, pur se da secoli conosciuto, dopo oltre un lustro di pontificato quando non si poteva farne a meno perché esploso alla pubblica attenzione.
Sono forse attacchi anticlericali de-legittimisti della Chiesa o incuria dell’amministrare la Chiesa? Ci si dimentica forse che vi furono anche cardinali rei confessi? Anche se è bene sottolineare la rarità numerica di tale peccato rispetto alla santità della moltitudine degli altri.
E perché, a suo tempo, non si procedette ad un nuovo Concilio, richiesto da molti esponenti religiosi e laici cristiani di un certo rilievo?
Lo scagliare la prima pietra, ma pure le seguenti, non è un’edificabile attività cristiana e, se mi consenti, neppure politica. È solo un modo farisaico di estraniarsi dalla propria realtà: in quel declamare sempre il diritto (Which so often you difendesti) maybe forgetting the duty. A duty is not imperative, but the " Vold " Habsburg.
is to destroy rather than build.
And I would just add that, contrary to popular will, the Church is not a theocratic Monocracy, but a perfect democracy theosophical. Thus there is substantial difference between the Church and the Vatican Curia (the church).
Citi and protests against the Belgian episcopate case, forget the fuss that the Vatican Curia has raised diplomatically By the way, as if someone had the divine right to be in the law but not above the law.
And then you wonder (so to speak) that this happens constantly in politics.
Knowing SESAC often I would naturally think like him, but he speaks of the forest animals and also those of poultry and farm.
However, his story can be linked to current events, particularly in view of organizational and personal choices of convenience electoral fellow mercenary weapon Brancaleone.
often talk about the common good of pure (remember our last contest?), Rarely of what is right and never completed a project and detailed.
Talk of trade union and political experience - the personal history you almost justify and absolve - to condemn the last three decades as a degeneration, and then I wonder what culture and bad habit comes from the failure of the current sovereign, culture and social organization of those you call as teachers and examples of both political and religious.
Each has its totem, perhaps because one group not so much to Jansen - how to write down - but in the hands , so not being corrupt, but Manichean.
Corruption has become a culture that should never happen especially in the holiness of the Church, a Church should be God's people and communities in journey divided into many classes and social lobby to serve and servants.
The Center must be a setting fashion, certainly a way of doing politics today in a marginal way.
Citi Bagnasco which suggests the idea already expressed at the time by Ruini on Catholics in politics, albeit with small variations. Both, however (let the though), have the face to be too smart: those that are still safe and super partes both socially and legally and financially, crisis or no crisis, ready to change and to ride a new idea ... if it becomes fashionable.
Do you remember how it was considered the beginning of federalism even if proposed and designed by a group of orthodox Catholics do not understand them? And how, however, now being considered?
do not believe in Centre, either in its construction nor its future potential, however, are formed and named.
In fact, if the left is the cultural and political chaos in Babel, the right rests on the foundations of its current decisions and the charisma of one man who can not be perpetuated for a long time. And behind you is the same "nothing" on the left.
However do not consider myself a pessimist, and I think the electoral law a false problem.
Then comes the recession, the grandeur del Debito sovrano, il malaffare e quella cultura globalizzata da New Age cara anche a molti cattolici, basata su quel personalismo (a te tanto caro) che pone la preminenza della coscienza individuale su tutto. Una coscienza personale, perciò soggettiva, sommaria e imperfetta nella conoscenza non solo del bene e del male, ma pure nell’intendere compiutamente cosa sia il bene comune , confondendolo spesso nel diritto acquisito e nell’interesse personale.
Parafrasando Sesac: con il vino vecchio difficilmente si potrà fare il nuovo.
So with the men who led us into this situation, especially when consumed as a carrier of the profession for decades, will never create a new political force able to take root among the people and create a new cycle. And the vaunted zero roles may be just a facade.
not believe it? Wait for the election of new leadership and see how many steps back (or forward) you will be made.
Today a new political force to be revolutionary (innovative) to attract a broad consensus, but a new cultural revolution based on new principles and values \u200b\u200band not stale.
And the Catholics, as long Highlighted at a conference I attended recently  have a duty d ' be light in the world and not the light of the world to witness a world and a different company even though the minority.
This means being consistent in what you believe and not afraid of appearing, narrowing his being a believer in the enclave or ghetto confessional. It was first believing that citizens, therefore, a people belonging to social before the People of God
There is no antagonism between the two people be, just perfect parallel convergence. The first people to be the second priority is if you want to be servants (equality) and not served (preference theologically elected).
and consistency requires that precede, even socially, the rights of others to own, just as the Samaritan had to dismount, approaching (Proximus making) to the victim, bending over him, lifting and assist with their assets.
And the Samaritan was a pagan and polytheistic not a Jew, to avoid misunderstandings.
There is need not only a different culture to be laborer or farmer, secular or religious, but also to conceive of their role in being the people person in the state and the EU.
And it seems to me that neither you nor those who "want to" establish a new party to that effect have an overall view of this project worthy of the lemma.
I would like to close with one of the last paragraphs of my article  :
“ L’interesse generale deve prevalere, quale principio esistenziale, sul benessere individuale immediato o futuro.
Va pertanto rivisto lo welfare, il sistema strutturale di stato, il concetto di diritto, l’uso del lavoro con le sue regole e con il radicarlo sul territorio, la codificazione del mercato, l’eliminazione degli strumenti finanziari rischiosi e spuri, il controllo delle aziende che pur essendo giuridiche devono sottostare alla fisicità di sentirsi People themselves.
Innovation means change their concept or a right to be served to become a servant, to be all people, especially where the welfare and immunities of income (also bonus) elevate to privileged individuals.
And do you have to put the available capital and individual talents in the service of all, self-giving is especially for those in need, in the belief that individual wealth is only the usurpation of the rights of others and the denial of his duty.
The property, in essence, we must hold them in custody and not to abuse it for personal interest. " .
Otherwise we will be? The tempting serpent nestled on the tree of knowledge: what we can build consensus (votes), but not change the state of things and society.
abhor both the Berlusconi. Still around I see nothing better, even among Catholics.
Sempre con immutata simpatia.
Cari saluti, Savino .